Medium · Logic ≥ 4
Why would a categorical no need a conditional no to support it?
Before thought effects; other dialogue conditions may apply.
1,091 · Voice lines
Why would a categorical no need a conditional no to support it?
Hmm... the kitchen is close by -- maybe the cook will be more forthcoming?
Or you broke the bird. That's why you brought the replacement. Out of guilt...
There are these things called days. You sleep between them. He's saying they'll come after you've slept. (Just making clear you got that.)
Relax. Knocking out the cafeteria manager is not going to solve your lodging problem, not in the long run.
It's safe to say this is about your karaoke performance.
Hmm... kitchen. It's right nearby. What if you asked the cook?
Or you broke the bird. It can also be that. I think Sylvie even...
Yeah, those numbers he's adding up must be making good sense to him right now.
The thing is, the RCM employs relatively few oxen. It's clear that what the lieutenant may lack in musculature he makes up for in other ways.
Clearly he prefers to think you're malingering. He cannot fathom that anyone could drink so much as to retroactively erase their entire life.
Look at you -- it's because you're a failure. They sent you to slight Precinct 57.